To explore the concept of bangs with a little more specificity, let’s break down some scenes from popular films. What we’re looking for here is a better understanding of why a particular scene has been chosen and how that particular scene begins.
The danger with this sort of analysis is that we’re looking at a linear medium. Unfortunately, one of the problems with analyzing the techniques of RPG play is that it’s difficult to establish common reference points: Whereas we can all pop in a Blu-Ray and watch the same movie, even groups running identical scenarios won’t necessarily have similar experiences.
For the purpose of this exercise, therefore, we’re going to pretend that these movies aren’t linear experiences. Even though, in reality, the outcome of each scene has already been predetermined we’re going to act as if that isn’t true. I’ll try to emphasize this by discussing the different outcomes a given scene might have.
Let’s start with The Avengers.
THE AVENGERS
At the beginning of the film, an evacuation has been ordered at the tesseract facility. The leads for the first several scenes are Nick Fury, Agent Coulson, and Agent Hill.
SCENE 1 – BANG: “Dr. Selvig read an energy surge from the tesseract. It’s a spontaneous event. We can’t shut it down.”
The agenda is: How is SHIELD going to react?
The agenda of this scene is interesting because of the way that it ties into the entire “Phase II vs. the Avengers Initiative” conflict that lies behind the entire film. It’s expressed most directly through the debate between Agent Hill and Director Fury, but we could also imagine a scenario where Fury reacts to the bang very differently: He chooses not to evacuate the facility because the work on the Phase II prototypes is too important to be disrupted (and the rest of the movie looks very different).
Most of this scene is color.
SCENE 2 – BANG: “There’s a huge burst of energy from the tesseract! Loki appears, wielding some sort of high-tech, spear-like weapon. It looks a lot like a Phase II weapon.”
The agenda is: Can SHIELD stop Loki from stealing the tesseract?
There’s also an interesting secondary agenda: Can they evacuate the compound before it collapses?
Note that both agendas are simultaneously set up with the bang.
This scene is obviously all about conflict and it lasts from Loki’s appearance until he makes his final escape: Martial arts flurry in the lab. Converting the featured characters of Hawkeye and Selvig. Bluffing Agent Hill. Car chase. Helicopter chase. The whole thing.
Let’s take a moment to imagine the agenda questions being answered differently during the actual play of an RPG: Maybe Coulson deprioritizes the evacuation of the facility and with his assistance they’re able to get the tesseract to the helicopter before Loki can get it. As a result, they lose the Phase II weapons (and a lot of their researchers), which will probably have a negative impact on their long-term resources. On the other hand, they’re able to secure the tesseract onboard the helicarrier. (Which is, of course, where Loki will end up targeting it next.)
SCENE 3 – BANG: “Your ruse has worked perfectly: You’re tied to a chair and being ‘interrogated’ by a Russian general. He’s got a couple of thugs flanking him. And there’s a table full of gleaming torture instruments shoved off to one side. You hear a large freight train go rumbling by outside.”
The agenda is: Can Natasha identify the other players in the general’s sale of illegal arms?
Natasha is the lead here, of course. The bang and agenda here are actually inconsequential (although if Natasha had followed up on this information she might have discovered that the thugs Loki was hiring came from this guy’s network). They’re really just providing contextualization for the next bang: “Agent Coulson calls. Barton’s been compromised.” That’s what the scene is really about: Is Natasha going to prioritize her personal commitment to Barton or the time she’s sunk into her current investigation?
Interesting note here. Whedon actually closes the scene with what could be interpreted as another bang: “Oh no. I’ve got Stark. You’ve got the big guy.” This prompts a scene which is actually not found in the movie (during which Natasha plans her operation to recruit Banner), but it’s an example of how effective it can be to deliver a bang and then immediately cut away from it. You’ll leave your players in anticipation of what the resolution of that bang will be.
SCENE 4 – BANG: “As you enter the house, you see the little girl hop out a window on the far side. The whole place looks abandoned.”
The agenda is: Is the Big Guy gonna show up?
The leads here are Banner and Natasha.
Note that you could also express this as, “Will Natasha successfully recruit Banner?” And while there is an element of that in the scene, it’s clearly a less interesting agenda and Whedon knows that. Which is why the question of Banner’s anger is introduced in the second line of the scene, the question of Banner being recruited doesn’t show up for another two minutes, and the scene ends when it’s clear Banner is able to keep it under control.
The important lesson to take away here, I think, is that the agenda of the scene is not always what the characters are talking about on the surface.
We’re also seeing how often Whedon employs escalating bangs throughout his scenes: There’s a girl asking you for help. The girl disappears. A beautiful superspy seems to materialize from behind a wall.
SCENE 5 – BANG: “The Council is demanding to know why you’re trying to reactivate the Avengers Initiative.”
The agenda is: Can Nick Fury convince the Council to activate the Avengers assets as a response team?
Mostly self-explanatory. Note that the conflict in this scene isn’t actually resolved. It is, at best, postponed. Remember that the big agendas will probably only be resolved over the course of multiple scenes.
On a personal note, I found this scene interesting because my initial impulse was to describe the bang as, “Sir. The Council is calling.” This bang is actually used later in the film and it works there because the circumstances of the call make it a big deal. Here, though, Whedon’s instinct is right: He cuts straight to the call.
And that would probably be the right call at the table, too: There’s really no reason to think that Nick Fury isn’t going to take a call from the Council at this point; ergo the decision to “pick up the phone” is not a meaningful choice and a harder frame is almost certainly the stronger, better choice.
Go to : The Art of Pacing – Film Banging: Alien


















