As virtually everyone in the world knows, there’s a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. I’m not going to spend a lot of time harping on details (since they’re well-known and you can Google ’em if you’re curious), but I have two thoughts on the matter I’d like share.
First, blame.
Second, solutions.
THE BLAME
Figuring out who, exactly, is to blame for this catastrophe is going to play out over several months. Possibly years. But there are a couple things which are abundantly clear:
(1) There’s something rotten with BP. When you’ve racked up 700+ safety violations at your deepwater drilling platforms and every other oil company has less than a dozen… well, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that BP was doing something wrong.
(2) Under President Bush, the Minerals Management Service somehow managed to devolve into the sort of cocaine-snorting, sex-addled, graft-ridden machine of corruption one really only expects to see in Hollywood action blockbusters. This was part of the Bush Administration’s wider failure to maintain the robust regulatory agencies required by law. (See also No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller.) And the election of Obama didn’t magically fix these problems.
Since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, the MMS has approved 27 new offshore drilling projects. All but one of these were granted the same exemptions from environmental review as the Deepwater Horizon platform. Incredibly, the reason these exemptions were granted is because of the implausibility of a spill resulting from deep water drilling.
(3) President Obama isn’t to blame for the current spill. Nor is it clear to me what action he could reasonably be taking at this point to speed the progress of disaster efforts in the Gulf. (Getting angry or wearing a less-fancy shirt won’t actually accomplish anything, no matter what the brain-dead, narrative-addicted media tries to tell you.)
But where Obama does deserve to be smacked around is the fact that he decided to reverse course on his campaign promise not to allow off-shore drilling. Of course, there was no way for Obama to know that the Deepwater Horizon disaster was coming (and that, as a result, he was irreparably shooting himself in the foot and wasting what could have been amazing political capital and a complete vindication of his policies).
But what Obama should have known is what everyone who supported his opposition to off-shore drilling knew years ago: Off-shore drilling platforms are not some form of magical technology which is completely impervious to bad luck, bad design, or bad maintenance. Like everything else ever built by man, this technology is fallible. And, as we’re seeing, the environmental impact when something goes wrong can be huge.
THE SOLUTION
All that being said, I have the solution for stopping the oil spill.
This isn’t because I’m a genius. It’s because everyone involved already knows what the solution is: Drilling relief wells which can be used to repressurize the pipe.
Everything else going on in the Gulf of Mexico right now is a sideshow of bread and circuses designed to keep people mildly appeased and distracted until the relief wells finally reach the right depth. (Which isn’t anticipated to happen until August.) Relief wells are the only way we know to stop spills from blowouts.
We know this because all of this has happened before: On June 3rd, 1979, the Ixtoc oil well suffered a blowout. All of the same techniques being attempted at Deepwater Horizon were attempted at the Ixtoc: Garbage was dumped into the hole. Mud was pumped into it. Chemical dispersants were used. A massive Top Hat-like cap was unsuccessfully lowered into place. (It was called — and I wish I was kidding as I said this — SOMBRERO.)
And the only thing that finally stopped the Ixtoc blowout were the relief wells that were finally drilled to relieve the pressure. The Ixtoc well was not successfully capped until March 1980.
So here’s the hard, bitter truth: There is absolutely nothing that can be done about this spill until the relief wells currently being drilled are completed.
But here’s what needs to happen in the future: Instead of waiting for disaster to strike before beginning the relief wells (which will then take months to reach the necessary depth), oil companies should be REQUIRED to maintain two relief wells in addition to their main well at ALL of their ocean oil rigs.
The next time disaster strikes, these pre-drilled relief wells can be quickly connected to the main well, pressure can be rapidly alleviated, and the scope of the disaster can be rapidly contained.
ARCHIVED HALOSCAN COMMENTS
Thomas W.
He’s just not particularly into solving the issue. It’s not a matter of which evil to chose. He doesn’t particularly care about doing stuff to mitigate the damage. It should be his top priority, to do all he can to help his people- instead, as we saw in his recent speech, he’s using this crisis to push cap and trade. As Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a californian democrat said: “The climate bill isn’t going to stop the oil leak. . . . The first thing you have to do is stop the oil leak.” His lack of any action to aid the people, and his manipulation of the crisis for political purposes which BP probably supports…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Climate_Action_Partnership
What with them being a founder of a group that lobbies for it, it dissapoints me.
http://www.env-econ.net/2009/02/cap-v-tax-bp-v-exxonmobil.html
Yeah, they said they’re pro cap and trade. He’s basically using the crisis that BP’s very lax management caused to push a bill that BP likes.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 2:58:47 PM
Justin Alexander
Thanks for the links, Thomas. I was unaware of a lot of this. I’m a little too aware of the reality of trying to reform massive bureaucracies to describe the MMS in April 2009, less than three months after Obama came into office, as “Obama’s organization”. (Particularly since that was only the latest in a long series of waivers.)
But I agree with you in general. And I’ve been voicing my doubts regarding the strength of Obama’s convictions since before the election (and seriously considered not voting for him as a result). While I’m still convinced that Obama was the lesser of two evils and a better President than the last one, both of those are ridiculously low bars to clear.
I also have yet to be actually impressed by a single thing he has done since taking office. The best he’s managed so far is to not disappoint; and even that hasn’t been consistent.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 1:51:20 AM
Thomas W.
You’re being way too light on Obama. His organisation issued a waiver for them- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/04/AR2010050404118.html
And why?
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=6584A5A0-18FE-70B2-A838E6437FBEC75D
“BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama”
He was heavily oiled.
Not only did the election of Obama not magically fix these problems, it likely magnfied them greatly.
There’s more and more evidence that there were a heck of a lot of warning signs that were ignored, that should have been taken into account. That would have been discovered if a less oiled president had been around, and his people had ordered a review. I know you’re majorly into the democrats, but you shouldn’t cut them any slack because they are democrats. Ok, Bush was corrupt- how are democrats any different?
I’ve heard stories of how MMS was figuratively (and literally, on ocassion) in bed with the oil industry, getting bonuses to approve whatever they wanted. Obama then appointed Salazar- a man who had long been extremely pro offshore drilling, who was very much in bed with the oil industry. He pushed ahead with drilling, harder than Bush’s people had. He kept the same managers in, fired a few lower down people, and nothing changed.
“Employees describe being in Interior – not just MMS, but the other agencies – as the third Bush term,” says Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which represents federal whistle-blowers. “They’re working for the same managers who are implementing the same policies. Why would you expect a different result?”
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/111965?RS_show_page=1
And on the oil spill- it’s a chaotic mess of authorities out there.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/15/science/earth/15cleanup.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
Obama should personally go out, and organise the cleanup effort, use his influence and power to set clear lines of command, cut through any regulations that are impeding them.
In particuar- they lack the required barriers, something which Obama could personally help with.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/05/wh-were-on-the-case-jindal-help.html
Obama could mitigate it.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 9:19:00 PM