This volume appears to be a cult manual for the Brotherhood of Songsingers.
The Songsingers worship chaos in the form of the Discord – the “song of chaos”. They perceive the ways of order as the monotony of a single note beaten again and again. They see, in their acts of chaos and wanton destruction, a “changing of the tune” to include discordant notes. It this discord, they believe, which is the essence of freedom and life. Without discord, liberty would be a hollow and empty shell.
But there is also a deeper level on which the Discord exists. The book speaks of the Galchutt – “Dukes of Chaos” who “slumber in eternal aeons” in their “caverns ever-echoing”. The cult believes that, through their religious rituals, they can open their “inner ear” to the whispers of Galchutt – whispers which are, in fact, the Song of Discord and of Chaos.
In this way, the actions of the cult can be seen as variations played upon an eternal theme chanted into the world by the sleeping Galchutt.
DESIGN NOTES
This lorebook notably describes a cult which DOESN’T appear in my Ptolus campaign. It’s something of a meta-red herring. It’s like the old joke: If you want to prank someone, sneak three pigs into their house. If you want to drive someone insane, release three pigs in their house and label them One, Two, and Four.
If I gave my players a list of the chaos cults who appear in the campaign, then that list simply becomes a checklist. But if that list includes additional entries, then its sows uncertainty: Where are the Songsingers? Why haven’t we encountered them? Did we miss them? What are they plotting?
And even after the players become certain that the Songsingers are not, in fact, part of the conspiracy they’re investigating, the references continue to evoke a wider, deeper, and more mysterious world: The Songsingers were not here, but they are out there. These things that you have experienced are only one part of a larger world.
There is some risk with this technique that the players will take the bit between their teeth and go haring off looking for the thing which, technically, was not part of the current scenario. But this is hardly a bad thing. “Oh, no! The players are pursuing something they’re passionate about!” It’s easy enough to follow their lead and gin up a new scenario. Perhaps it’s only a side quest. Perhaps you (or they) can find some clever way to reflect it back into the primary scenario.
