The Alexandrian

The Pride Cul-de-Sac

February 5th, 2009

(1) The first step on the path of maturing as a human being is the acquiring of a sense of self — learning the distinction between Self and the Others around you.

(2) The necessary precept of the tribe also necessitates our ability to identify ourselves as a member of a larger group, creating a sense of Us versus the Other.

(3) This sense of community has resulted in many good things — its the basis of cooperation and civilization. However, it also a darker side: The origin of all prejudice lies in the instinctual elevation of the individual’s immediate community (Us) above other communities (Other).

(Some of this is an outgrowth of our natural competition as a species. But part of it is an unhealthy tendency to elevate oneself not through personal achievements but by denigrating others: The poor pale-skinned southern farmer can feel good about himself because he “knows” himself to be superior to those with dark skin. The abusive husband mitigates his own failures in life by destroying his wife. And so forth.)

(4) Cultural or systemic prejudice sets in when the other becomes subjugated — either physically or ideologically — into accepting the elevation or “superiority” of the other group.

(5) The natural first step in attempting to liberate the oppressed and create a proper equality between two separate communities, therefore, has been to increase the pride of the oppressed group. Blacks must first be willing to have pride in themselves before they can fight for their rights. Women must have pride in themselves before they can leave the feminine mystique of “housewife”.

(6) However, there is a trap. First, and most obviously, the search for pride can often tap into that same instinctual elevation of the individual’s immediate community. Thus, it’s not enough for women to claim their rightful place as human beings… all men must become rapists. It’s not enough for the slaves to be set free… the slavers must be made the slaves.

(7) The more insidious trap, however, is that be emphasizing the need for pride, the civil rights movements deepen the sense of identity in the community. But it is the very distinction between communities which allows the racists or the sexists to flourish.

When there is a legitimate basis for the community, the possibility of prejudice against that community is unavoidable and must simply be guarded against with constant vigilance. For example, a Jew or a Catholic or a Republican all have a legitimate community.

But what about those communities which only exist because of prejudice? Why, for example, are all those with dark skin grouped together into a single community whereas all those with blue eyes or red hair are not similarly grouped together?

These illegitimate communities are, fundamentally, part of the problem. Ironically, however, they have also been made part of the solution: By creating a sense of pride in a community which, by all rights, shouldn’t exist, the illegitimate community is perpetuated and the fundamental foundation on which all prejudice is built remains intact.

At some point, therefore, it follows that the illegitimate community must be discarded entirely and the foundation ripped away. But here the trap snaps shut: In order to fight back against prejudice, the civil rights movement has fostered a sense of pride in the illegitimate community. In doing so they have turned that community into a force capable of effecting societal change… but it has also led them into a cul-de-sac. Such a movement can effect great change, but — like a man trying to pick up the board on which he is standing — it will find itself fundamentally stymied in attempting to rip away the foundation in which the prejudice it fights takes root.

The question then becomes: How do you escape from this pride cul-de-sac? How can a community voluntarily — and positively — disassemble itself?

One Response to “The Pride Cul-de-Sac”

  1. Justin Alexander says:

    ARCHIVED HALOSCAN COMMENTS

    Mortegro
    Thanks for the correction. I do feel that it’s peculiar when such racial communities exist on the basis of race alone and not on other qualities. The fault of racial profiling then leads these communities to be prejudice against anyone who isn’t following the stereotype and who instead tries to better themselves. This is when I hear about black and hispanic kids (my girlfriend included) being “white” or “too white.” I find it sad when the level of education and quality of life enjoyed by some caucasian people is looked down upon by these prejudicial communities without any truly rational reason behind it.

    And then I feel like I’m prejudice for thinking this way, even when I am just making a valid assessment of other people’s behavior. Damn racism Frown
    Saturday, February 07, 2009, 7:24:39 AM


    Justin Alexander
    While any form of social organization — whether it’s a business, sports team, fanclub, gaming group, city, or nation — can both be the target of prejudice and serve as a gestative womb for superiority, they also have an existent independent of that.

    For example, even if there were no religious prejudice in this world there would still be Jewish synogogues and Catholic churches.

    OTOH, there’s no independent reason for the existence of a “black community”. The only reason a “black community” exists is because it was segregated on the racist belief that those with different skin tones belong to different “races”. (That’s why there isn’t a “blue-eyed community” or a “red-haired community”.)

    So when I use the term “legitimate community”, I’m talking about one that has an independent, memetic reason for existing.
    Thursday, February 05, 2009, 2:56:25 PM


    Mortegro
    How are Jewish or Catholic communities legitimate communities? Didn’t their formation stem from the same form of prejudice that blacks did? Catholic and Jewish discrimination was rather evident during their initial immigration to America, and they came together in the form of small communities to protect themselves. Don’t many Jewish and Catholic (or any Christian) communities take their pride too seriously and exhibit the same signs of exclusivity that a prejudice black community might?

    I’m probably just jumping too hard on your example, but I feel that just about any cultural or religious group in America initially formed out of that misplaced sense of pride and elevated status. Hispanics, Asians, Indians, Muslims, Baptists, etc., the list goes on in terms of prejudiced communites. What differs between them is their level of prejudice and their willingness to meld with other communities.
    Thursday, February 05, 2009, 8:47:03 AM

Leave a Reply

Archives

Recent Posts


Recent Comments

Copyright © The Alexandrian. All rights reserved.