It’s interesting reading Dune
immediately following a mass-reading of Vernor Vinge’s catalog, because
both authors are essentially fascinated by post-humanity: Both see
something essentially incomprehensible in the transhuman, but they
approach it in different ways. Vinge chooses to approach it at oblique
angles – from the POV of children; or on the rapid approach to it; or
from a great distance; or through the lens of the primitive.
Herbert,
on the other hand, tends to tackle the transhuman directly, but he does
so from a fundamentally religious point of view.
To be clear on
the distinction here: Vinge also equates transhumanity with godhood
(the references to “Applied Theology” and “deicide”, for example, in A Fire Upon the Deep). But Herbert actually structures his narrative around a religious viewpoint – he couches his understanding of the transhuman through symbolism and prophecy; through divine mystery and ceremony.
Of
course, the post-humanities of Vinge and Herbert are not exactly
identical, either. But it would be interesting to see Vinge tackle
Herbert’s thought (as expressed in an interview): “I had this theory
that superheroes were disastrous for humans, that even if you
postulated an infallible hero, the things this hero set in motion fell
eventually into the hands of fallible mortals. What better way to
destroy a civilization, society or a race than to set people into the
wild oscillations which follow their turning over their critical
judgment and decision-making faculties to a superhero?”
And it would be equally interesting to have seen Herbert tackle Vinge’s thesis: “Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine
that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any
any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of
these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could
design even better machines; there would then unquestionably
be an "intelligence explosion," and the intelligence of man
would be left far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent
machine is the _last_ invention that man need ever make,
provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to
keep it under control.
...
It is more probable than not that, within the twentieth century,
an ultraintelligent machine will be built and that it will be
the last invention that man need make."
But I digress.
For those of you completely unfamiliar with Dune, it may suffice to say that it is one of those works grouped with the Foundation Trilogy or The Lord of the Rings: A transformative and pivotal classic which cast a long shadow upon the entire genre from the moment it was published.
To understand how Dune achieved this stature, consider for the moment a seemingly simple question: What is the most impressive thing about Dune?
The trick is not in any particular answer. It is in the breadth
of answers your question will provoke. Many people will point to the
planet of Arrakis itself -- painstakingly rendered and with a
completely realized ecology. Others will point to the manipulation of
prophecy. Or the action-packed battle sequences. Or the alien cultures.
Or the evocative future history. Or the exploration of religious themes. The story of Dune
is a political thriller; it’s a character drama; it’s high tragedy;
it’s mythological; it’s religious. And then Herbert tells it in the
style of historical fiction within one of the most deeply realized
science fiction settings ever realized on paper. It’s a gestalt
creation.
And what do I, personally, find most impressive about Dune?
The fact that Herbert successfully realized a story with the emotional
depth and archetypal resonance of a Greek tragedy. I’ve probably read, watched, and listened to the Dune
story more than two dozen times. And yet, every single time, there’s
something fresh and new which can be gleaned from the experience. GRADE: A+
For additional comments on Dune,
which include SPOILERS, click here.
|
|
Link
|
